Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,982 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Emochi: Chat With Character

FlowGPT

Step into a Unique AI Chat Adventure – Anime, Manga, & More!

4.5 ★1,044,521 ratings
10M+Downloads
17+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Step into a Unique AI Chat Adventure – Anime, Manga, & More!

Discover a world of creative AI chat characters! Emochi lets you chat about your favorite topics—anime, manga, games, and more—while creating and customizing unique AI characters. Build compelling personas, explore fascinating backstories, and capture unforgettable moments with visually stunning AI-generated imagery.

Key Features: - Endless Conversation Possibilities: Dive into in-depth discussions on anime plot twists, debate character arcs, or explore your favorite fantasy worlds. Chat with AI characters that are funny, thoughtful, or adventurous—tailored to your preferences. - Create Unique AI Personas: Design custom AI characters with distinct traits and personalities.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

6 screenshots
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 1
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 2
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 3
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 4
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 5
Emochi: Chat With Character screenshot 6

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 2.2.11 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.2.11, updated 2026-09-29.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 2.2.11, scanned 2026-10-01.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 34abebe94199…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Aggressive ad load
2 independent sources agreefrom user reviews and the app's own on-screen textartefact 34abebe94199…
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch ad to get 5 Mochi"

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 34abebe94199…
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
What we saw: Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Time Offer"
Reported by users: Users describe the free version as usable
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly say the free version is worth using on its own. Nothing we can measure corroborates that — a free listing with in-app purchases looks identical whether the free tier is generous or a demo — so this is published as what reviewers say, not as a measured credit.
What we saw: Reviewers describe the free version as usable: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.3% of 1982 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact 34abebe94199…
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Purchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“trash app, trash memory, too much bug, too much ads.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-29
Aggressive ad load
“I really liked this app until ads started popping up after every single response,in need of major updates ,freezes up the phone all day today. not working correctly, buttons have to be pressed multiple times before anything happens, very…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-09-27
Aggressive ad load
“there is ads every 4 message once . it's annoying. I can't even enjoy the app”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-28

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 2.2.11.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.