Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 461 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Goods Jam: Goods Sorting

iKame Games - Zego Studio

Goods Jam: Goods Sorting, a product developed by iKame Games, is the ultimate…

4.6 ★98,281 ratings
1M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Goods Jam: Goods Sorting, a product developed by iKame Games, is the ultimate sorting games adventure. Step into a fun world of goods jam puzzles, where you can relax with calming levels or challenge your brain with exciting matching games. This goods jam game blends fun sorting games challenges with engaging matching games levels for a truly strategic goods sorting experience. Get ready to clear tricky levels, match master goods jam matching games, and explore a dynamic world full of exciting goods sorting action.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 1
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 2
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 3
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 4
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 5
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 6
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 7
Goods Jam: Goods Sorting screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 1.125.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 1.125.1, updated 2026-09-25.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 54 distinct reviewers (11.7% of 461 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.3% of 461 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.5% of 461 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“to many ads. the game is fun and "easy" in the beginning. But when you get up a bit in the levels they become impossible to solve without watching ads to get power ups that enable you to pass. after even more levels, you can't even watch…”
2★ · Google Play · 2026-04-30
Aggressive ad load
“Absolutely Loved this game in the begining, i first gave it 5 stars and now i have given it 1. It is so much fun until you get to a certain level, then it becomes pay to win. There is absolutely no way past unless you buy boosters, you…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-24
Aggressive ad load
“Was a fun game but be prepared to pay. Impossible to pass levels forcing you to use boosters which suspiciously are not sufficient. No other options like ad watch and the package prices are too much for little reward. Get the impression…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-26

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 1.125.1.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.