“It's a pretty good game and fun to play, but i have feedback, please make this game less p2w and more f2p because it's kinda hard to get items and the matchmaking is sometimes unbalanced. Overall, it's a recommended game if you like FPS…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 626 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.
World War 2－FPS Shooting Games
Edkon Games GmbHGet ready to rewrite history in World War 2: FPS Shooting Games!
4.4 ★567,813 ratings
50M+Downloads
12+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
Get ready to rewrite history in World War 2: FPS Shooting Games! Step into intense multiplayer battles that capture the essence of World War II. With immersive gameplay, authentic settings, and thrilling PvP action, this first-person shooter (FPS) brings the drama and strategy of the 1940s battlefield straight to your mobile device. Whether you’re a fan of tactical shooters or love the challenge of fast-paced PvP games, World War 2 is the ultimate experience for history and action enthusiasts.
BUILD YOUR HISTORIC ARSENAL Take command of iconic World War II weaponry in this ultimate first-person shooter. From bolt-action rifles and pistols to machine guns and bazookas, every weapon in this shooting game is designed with historical accuracy. Upgrade and customize your arsenal to dominate the battlefield.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
This analysis describes version 5.09 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.09, updated 2026-09-18.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 5.09, scanned 2026-09-24.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
1–2 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
In the app's own text: Hard to cancel
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 626 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“👎 Pay to win!👎 This game is God of pay to win. What's the point?”
“I love this game, but it has one big problem, this game won't give you enough silver and gold to buy weapons and equipment,it's basically pay to win .”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 5.09.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.