We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 2.18.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.18.0, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
CAN’T CANCEL TRIAL — I downloaded the app…don’t work for what I needed. I’ve been trying to cancel the “Trial” and keep getting an error message that I need to HOP over to the App Store. Well that doesn’t work as it tells you to open the…
Impossible to cancel subscription — After you cancel, it takes you to an offer with 50% off and leaves you there. Can’t go forward or back so you are unsure if you have cancelled the sub. No review of the app itself as I didn’t like the…
Cancel app — Very difficult to cancel the app. Still trying to cancel
Paywall blocks the basics
You need to pay — You need to pay for everything in this app, can’t save pr export any edited photo unless you subscribe.
Not worth it — You have to pay for anything
horrible — you literally have to pay for everything you can’t even save a picture
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertising — Once I opened the app it gave me 2 options of free for occasional users and $10.99 weekly for professionals. I did click on the top option, free random use however once I tried a picture it didn’t allow me to move on…
False Advertisement — It’s a given that we ALL believed we could save the low quality image or perhaps endure a minute long advertisement. Instead we are REQUIRED to have a subscription on a FREE Apple Application. The fact alone it’s…
Didn’t take my review seriously — Again as the title says. I got a response from the developer and albeit they were nice, they didn’t really address the issue. Nowhere does this app state that you can’t save anything without paying. Maybe…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.