Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
Do not purchase subscription — False advertising is what it is. You get 35 credits a day that expire if not used. You need to purchase credits to use on top of subscribing. What a waste!! Almost nothing is 35 credits.
False advertising — Downloaded thinking I was going to be about to use the reunited with a loved one. I just lost my brother and I wanted to use it but unfortunately I can’t because I gotta buy a membership.
Jon — This another bait switch app, all of these photography app have no integrity, they make false promises and falsely advertise. This app was amazing at first but just like all the others they got greedy. Once you make a yearly…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.