We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 7.1.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.1.1, updated 2026-08-23.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Clickbait — Came up as a ad on social media. Promised free trial but billed 7.99 immediately and on top of that only allowed to wait 1 video and asking for more money in case I want to edit another video $1.99 per video. Don’t subscribe…
Confusing Payment and Tokens — The video AI is pretty good, but it said that you get a free trial, to which I was immediately charged $5+ and THEN I was charged another $5+ for tokens. AND THEN, they were vague with token usage, as one…
Beware of these scammers! — They trick you into a free trial only to get charged right after you use the app. SCAMMERS!
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Kool but… — This app is very kool to play with!.. Unfortunately the Developers are greedy and deceptive. I paid for unlimited and still being asked to pay for additional creations!.. So my pro subscription is false!.. I may demand a…
AI Video Purchase — I paid for $5.99 for 5 videos and I can generate one video if that was the case I would paid $1.99 for one video. False advertisement.
Misleading — This app is straight up misleading. First off, they advertise a “free trial” but there isn’t one. You have to pay just to even try it out. Second, they offer a package for 5 videos but don’t be fooled. It actually costs all 5…
Paywall blocks the basics
BS!!!! — So not only do I have to pay for a subscription!!!! I have to pay for credits to even use the app?!?!?! F THIS APP !!!! NO stars!!! and I won’t be re subscribing!!!!
Trash App — Once again, we have yet another one of these apps where you have to pay to do anything on. To make matters worse, I wasted two dollars to grant the access to make one video which turned out to not even be enough as, despite…
Misleading — This app is straight up misleading. First off, they advertise a “free trial” but there isn’t one. You have to pay just to even try it out. Second, they offer a package for 5 videos but don’t be fooled. It actually costs all 5…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.