We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.30 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.30, updated 2026-09-21.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Paywall with no way past it
Trash — I had to pay for a trial and couldn’t even use the app without paying additional fees. I was only trying to get to see what it was like. If I could give zero stars, I so freaking would.
App — Wurst app u can have… gotta pay subscription gotta pay to use feature gotta pay for everything I mean what’s the point of the subscription if u can’t use nothing without paying at this point just delete the app in general..
Switch N bait — Not a free trial reel you in for 99cents 7day but can’t try it out without paying another $10 . Don’t even know if it works .
Paywall blocks the basics
What’s the point of a subscription — Literally what’s the point on buying the subscription if u gonna have to pay for literally anything you do in that app money grabbing business forsure
Scam — This is the biggest scam I have ever seen you have to pay to use the app then immediately again after you pay to make a song with your own voice you have to pay again the whole thing they advertise you have to make 2 separate…
Shoom — I tried it you have to pay for EVERYTHING
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False Ad — Why can’t I make a song on the trial??? You tell me 3 credits I waste 3 mins recording and then you want 9.99!!! I’ll use it IF I like it. I’m not paying up front to make a song u said cost “3 credits “! Bad biz.
Scam — Misleading advertising and dark patterns
Fake ad — You download app with advertised features, you pay for it, then you try to test it and it asks you to pay even more. If I knew that it will work this way would never try it in the first place. Try different app, there are way…
Reports of unexpected charges
Great app but… — This app is amazing but it should really let us stack our credits otherwise you are just stealing our money…and I’m going to want a refund for all the credits not stack since I bought my subscription…
Does not work with your own voice — It kept charging me for song creations and each time I recorded my voice. For a 7-day trial that I already paid for, that is ridiculous. On top of it, the vocals I recorded for AI to use for my songs…
Cool — There’s a lot of restrictions. You can’t choose your musical/melodic tone or your gender. I tried to describe what should be happening in the midst of the lyrics and it sang that part lol. The AI voice training is sort of weird…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.