Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 1,150 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 9.9.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.9.4, updated 2026-09-22.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 9.9.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 9.9.4, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
multiple times I've been interrupted in the middle of a game I pause it and it completely kicks me out losing my "perks" and other times I've paused it and it actually holds the game. the constant ads popping up or how u have to wait…
to many ads. why? why we have to watch an ad every single thing we do. I get you need them to pay for your game. but geez. you shouldn't have to watch one for everything you need to do to play a level.
dreadful. a good game ruined by the greed of developers who just want.you to purchase add ons or other apps. too many adds and too many glitches. I would avoid this and other games by the same company such as 'tile in hole'
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Ads on Facebook presented this game. with the ad, the whole time, it states "Game with no Ads" in the corner. I conplete 15-20 levels and guess what shows up. Ads. False advertisement to get the views and downloads? disrespectful.
The ad said there were no timers in this game, but they lied. There ARE timers. False advertisement.
fake ad, it said no ads, and guess what... there are ads... after each level...
Pay to progress
Great game! Easy to learn, fun to play. There are plenty of opportunities to earn coins, so you aren't constantly feeling pressured to pay real money to advance. I'm going to purchase the add free version, just to give back to the…
as you progress in the game, levels are designed so they are impossible in the time allotted and cannot beat without paying or power-ups. every five levels. when power-ups are used, bombs show up in unavoidable places. sometimes the hole…
overall it's a nice game. good way to kill time before bed which is what I use mobile games for. this one could have been perfect for that but the problem with this game (and this is MY problem IK) is it has no dark mode so most stages…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.