Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 504 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 13.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 13.5, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
Forced upgrade — I am updating this review based on being contacted by the program owner. The program does in fact still work for my lifetime membership. The obstacles that I thought were, I believe current advertising in the app. So I am…
Several years — We purchased this several years ago when it was $9.99 one time fee. We have used this app many many times, I’m sure it’s worth the new price.
Customer Service?? — I have been using the app for 4 or 5 year’s and love that you can easily find the next rest stop,travel center or camp ground. I recently went into the app and there was something about an update. After hitting the…
Paywall blocks the basics
You cannot do anything without a subscription. Not what I was looking for.
Paid App Removes Features — Paid $10 for this app years ago, now the features I paid for have been placed behind a paywall. Same thing has happened with Campendium and other RV apps so it shouldn’t be surprising, but they started out…
Locked Behind Paywall — Can’t do a single thing without a pop up to join premium and pay $$$
Aggressive ad load
Very Poor — Too many ads. Always trying to get you to upgrade. Other apps do a much better job without the hassle.
Was great, now not so much — Was my favorite campground finder until they discovered pop-up ads. I paid good money for the premium version, not to be force feed their ads.
Ads are insane — Every time you pause for a few moments, there are intrusive ads that take over most of the screen and require you to click an X to close them. I paid for this app fair and square and now I’m suddenly being exploited for…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
was advertised as a one time $10 price to use but it's actually a monthly subscription at the most basic tier. false advertising
Advertised as free but pay only there are so many free apps that do the same thing or very cheap I'll pass
Bait and Switch — App sucks. Advertised as free but only useful if you pay. This is fine but be honest up front that the app is useless you pay.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.