Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Misleading advertising
I purchased the app and it was OK for what it was. All of a sudden, just recently, the app does not want to open unless I "subscribe" for extra money. This is a bait and switch as I paid for it once and now I can't use it. I subscribed…
Great app, bought it three weeks ago. All of a sudden it is making me sign in with google and does not recognize my subscription. Paid 9 $ and the app wont work now... seems a bit pricey to get 3 weeks of use for that price.... If this is…
Bait and switch. I must echo the recent sentiment - you have charged us for an app, then switched to a subscription model demanding more money, with no forewarning and no refund for the purchase. This is very poor form, and very…
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.