We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 3.4.77 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.4.78, updated 2026-10-01.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 3.4.77, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 3.4.78 · 2026-10-01
Thank you for using AppClose. We update the app regularly to make it better for you. Today’s update includes: • Performance and stability enhancements Please make sure to update your app so you’re using the latest version. If you discover a bug or error, please be kind and let us know at [email protected]. Our innovative and hardworking IT team is always ready to help and will fix any issues right away.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Bait and switch — They wait until they get courts to mandate it for thousands of users because it’s free and then they charge money. It’s not even a good app and paying a subscription doesn’t get you any additional features. No AI to help…
Bait and Switch — I wonder how many people they were able to get this court ordered to have since it was free. To turn around and put it behind a pay wall knowing that it would cost more to get parenting plans changed. -Developer responds…
Bait and switch — Awesome how you got all these court orders to require your ‘free’ app and now change it to paid. I hope every user complains to the FTC and to their state attorney and you’re banned from ever participating in something…
Paywall blocks the basics
Sucks — This app sucks not a fan. Confusing and can’t get anything done cost way to much it was free now pay to much
Not worth the trouble even when it’s free — Difficult to use, when you try to add an agreed parenting schedule the calendar does not reflect the addition correctly. Tried this app to see my schedule months ahead since it was free but now…
ALWAYS FROZEN!!! — I got the app because it was free then it made us purchase a subscription. Now im paying for an app that freezes every time i go to use it!!!! Ive been trying to read the dang messages that got sent over an hour ago and…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.