Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
I hadn't played in about 4 months so I decided to try it out again, it is way worse. massively pay to win, they did horrible reworks and the reworks are simply to get more money. all this company wants is your money and they don't care at…
It was such a good game Played it non stop for months. Happily paid for monthly subscriptions. But now it is purely PTW. I used to win roughly 1 in 3 games And looking at other players stats most people were in that area. some better some…
Not worth it. Pay to win, and developers don't listen. Goblins are a problem, and the answer they gave was to increase the token cost on packs needed to upgrade your decks.
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.