Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Trial converts to a charge
Lied about free trial. I signed up for the 2 week free trial and it charged me for the year immediately.
Look, I see the vision, however, the subscription is already expensive enough and to tack on an extra 10$ for "premium" is just an insult really. Also, thanks for the "free trial" in which you automatically charged my card. Still waiting…
I believe this is some type of scam. It said I would have a two week free trial and it charged me the same day. I immediately canceled. I only had the app for 5 min and was charged for a year? I will be reporting this immediately
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.