What’s the catch? Reports of unexpected charges — reported by 32 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 3.12.63 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.12.66, updated 2026-10-02.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 3.12.63, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 3.12.66 · 2026-10-02
Bug fixes and improvements.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports of unexpected charges
Payment issues — I cancelled my subscription back in January of this year due to me getting double charged by the app. Yet I am still getting a weekly charge without having an active subscription. I have tried getting in contact with the…
SCAM — THIS APP IS A SCAM! They will keep charging you a monthly fee even if you don’t sign up or approve it! I can’t figure out how to cancel this and have been fighting with my credit card company about getting it cancelled. No help…
stealing my money — i canceled this app months ago and theyre still taking from my bank account 😭 im not sure what to do
Trial converts to a charge
Fraud — Do not get this app or the FREE trial they charge you anyway and you won’t have access to the month they charged you for and you won’t get your money back. This is a huge scam!! Oh and the app is probably the WORST Astrology app…
Charged without approval — I used the free trial and I was charged $6.99 for the app. There is no way to get a refund
$6.99 a week??? — I didn't even have a chance to look around at the app, I wasn't even going to claim my free trial knowing I would be charged to $6.99 a week? That is insane.
Paywall blocks the basics
Sad to see — Everything is behind a paywall now which sucks. Features like the ask me anything aren’t even free anymore. This app had pretty accurate advice, sucks to see this happening
I liked it when it was free… — To start I do like this app. I would go on there and learn about myself, and really start to learn about Astro-cartography in a nutshell. Not sure when it happened but now you have to pay to use the app, and…
Annoying — You have to pay for everything and I’m trying to find an app that doesn’t make you pay but it’s alright once you pay but it’s not worth paying for
Hard to cancel
Didn’t sign up and my credit card got charged from information taken from Apple — I didn’t sign up for this app and now I’m being charged for it with no way to cancel and nobody to contact. The support link on here takes you to a…
Scam — This app forces you into a subscription and you can’t cancel it with apple because it’s a third party. So they repeatedly charge you for something you canceled and there’s no way to contact them.
DO NOT USE UNABLE TO CANCEL SUBSCRIPTION — This App is ripped off and I’m unable to cancel te subscription after the initial 7 days it keep getting billed.
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 7 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.