We analyzed this app across 6 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.164 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.164, updated 2026-10-01.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.225 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.225, updated 2026-09-27.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Oh boy this is great! — I ABSOLUTLEY LOATHE this game! Avatar world is the most funnest game ever and you dont even need to wait for ADDS!🤩🤩🤩 Like, any other game would have lots of adds and the best part, EVERYTHING is free! Like when…
Paywall blocks the basics
Why I love, Pazu — I love this game even though you have to pay for some things. It feels like you don’t have to pay for anything you can make a whole world without paying for anything. It’s amazing. I love this game.pazu has changed my…
Amazing game — This game was so fun and I’ve been playing it since it first came out so if you are wondering whether to download it or not DOWNLOAD IT!!! Because it’s such a fun game with amazing characters and a lot of places and…
Amazing — I love avatar world and I don’t understand why most people like Toca world more, in Toca world you have to pay for nearly everything, in avatar world there are packs and stuff that you can get, but you are able to make a decent…
Users describe the free version as usable
BEST GAME EVER! — This is the best game I have ever gotten. I definitely recommend this game. There are no adds and you don’t have to pay for any of the places you want to go to. (There are EXTRA things that you can pay for so no one…
Get this app right now by cutest pie — So this game called avatar world is like so much fun like l could play this game for hours l just love it 😍 so much it’s better than I thought. It’s better than toca boca avatar world is great 😊…
Please more cool updates!? — I've been playing for almost a year now and I love the game so much. I just wish that you didn't have to pay for a lot of stuff. for example. The galaxe house at least have half of it we can use but you have…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.