Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 501 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 13.37 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 13.37, updated 2026-09-26.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
I usually don't write reviews but this bait and switch does it. I paid for this app in the past to use it on my Android phone, and paid again on my wife's iphone. Now they're asking for a subscription for 6.49 monthly. Unthinkable. I paid…
For users who previously purchased the app, the pricing model is basically a bait and switch.
Edit to clarify, I bought the app for full access on both Android and iOS when my first child was born in 2020. When I added a profile for my newly born second child, I discovered I can't use it for them without the new subscription. They…
Paywall blocks the basics
My sister used this app with my niece so it was an easy decision to purchase it for my first child. Just had our second and found out now you have to pay a subscription fee. I am so disappointed. Since I purchased it, I'd think I would at…
I have had this app for years. I just had a baby a week ago and started using it again. While I was in the middle of nursing him and had the timer going, it wouldn't let me save it and said I now have to pay a monthly fee to save it. My…
While I appreciate the ability to log diaper changes and feedings and sync with my partner, I was surprised when the monthly subscription paywall began. As a parent who was invited to join an existing child profile that my spouse set up…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.