Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 406 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 4.3.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.4.0, updated 2026-09-21.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 4.3.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 4.4.0 · 2026-09-21
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
I'm on level 968 and now they have made it impossible to win this level. I've been addicted to this game so I put up with the excessive ads, but now I'm done. 4 times it ended the game on me when I still had lives left. Made it to level…
trash. power ups are useless and do practically nothing. once you hit lvl 27 you get hit with EXTREMELY LONG UNSKIPABLE ADS EVERY 2 LEVELS. I'm talking 1&1/2 - 2minute long ads. it's 10x faster to just close and reopen the game
I used to love this game until they changed it recently. Now you can't just watch ads to earn fast forwards, you have to buy coins or wait for devices to finish being created. Ruined the game for me!
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Rewards for 2 or 3 hours free play allegedly given but aren't really there. I still run out of lives after just five failed levels. This bug is directly responsible for my not just failing to collect the required number of ladybugs -- I…
This game really helps you get your mind of things. The first 200 levels are easy enough to race through. I want 3 stars in every game so I persevere till I get them otherwise I'd probably be on a higher level by now. Use the power house…
Totally broken as of last update, I dunno what exactly you updated, but for myself and it seems many others, you get stuck on some level, and can't progress, no matter how many times you replay,no matter how many stars you get - I'll…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.