We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 0.18.103 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 0.18.103, updated 2026-09-27.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Refunds impossible — They offer a free trial, but make it extremely hard to cancel and they don’t get back to you for a refunds, haven’t heard from them and I’ve emailed them multiple times.
Free Trial Scam — Look at all the ones star reviews. They make it impossible to cancel your free trial
Scam — Stay away. You can’t cancel once you are in. You are stuck. They got me with free trial and charge me $63 even after I canceled. I tried to cancel again not working and deleted my account. Now I am trying to get my money back.
Trial converts to a charge
Charged me without permission — It literally charged me 40$ without my permission right as i pressed the free trial button. SCAM!! THEY’RE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE THAT ARE STRUGGLING
Great app, no warning about subscription — When I started the free trial, they gave me the option to opt in to a 2 day heads up before they charged me for the subscription annually. This morning out of no where I was charged with no heads…
Charge me without any warning!! — I did free trial but I was going to cancel it once the free trail ends but no they charge me 199.99 for a year!!! I want my money back !
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.