Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 408 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 3.7.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.7.6, updated 2026-09-16.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
Fun concept, & okay play. I was on the fence deleting the app for a long time. Why? So many ads & literal impossible to win levels without spending coins or power-ups. They introduced some fun mission system as a way to earn coins. Within…
the game is rigged to force you to spend in order to advance. I have a video of a stuck ball on a pattern in the corner. the last ball I need to advance. But it won't go where it should. randomizer is trash and unless you spend, you can't…
too many unskippable adds, and its a pay to win game.
Aggressive ad load
Edited: as soon as I left this review an ad to continue option appeared. --- This game started okay, but level 34 is now impossible without power ups. I tried looking for a walkthrough online, but the new level is much harder than the…
I fell for clever design. No forced ads for the first 20 levels, then the ads get just as predatory as all other puzzle games. The good news is that they advertise their adbuster purchase as a one-time deal, but there's no reason to trust…
3 star. once you get all of the "helpers", the stages force you to use them and it's hard to get extra "helpers". There's an ad after every level, if you want extra coins (and you do, believe me) and A LOT of times, you'll watch the ad…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
My favorite phone game until they changed it over night. What a weird decision from the creators. I was gonna get on here and say false advertisement but now all the pictures on the play store are changed to the new terrible version too…
they have ruined the game! I am over level 3400 and suddenly they changed the game. my favorite game and they pulled a bait and switch.
game said no ads and I get hit with a ad and then a offer to remove ads for money. misleading advertisement
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.