Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,141 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 3.6.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.6.7, updated 2026-10-01.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.5.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.5.4, updated 2026-09-17.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Billed several times at sign up, more than the $1 advertised. Cannot cancel because there's an imaginary password and not receiving reset password email. Off to notify bank and dispute charges and change card numbers. UPDATE 8/18/2026…
I tried the trial, then decided it wasn't worth it for me. I went into the play store to cancel my subscription after deleting the app and made sure I wasn't subscribed. That was like 2 weeks ago. This morning I woke up and I've been…
this is absolutely scam. nowhere it says that I am turning on monthly subscription. now I can't cancel It from the app. i want to cancel monthly subscription.
Reports of unexpected charges
The app is fine and im sure it helps some people. I was immediately turned off buy the confusing charges. I paid the $18 they "claim" it costs them to take the test and start a "trial period." Was charged $20 four days later and then $30…
Fraudulent money stealing scam pedalling a really stupid app. I agreed to $1 charged $7.99 and want my money back! Apparently when I was hitting skip to avoid the 3 additional junk offers, one hit. Horrible email ignore system rather than…
Fishing/Scam/Tricking into Payment and Subscription: No real analysis is sent by mail, you're tricked me to pay 15 USD even if given consent to 1 USD all outside google. Please refund 14 USD ASAP, or face a group complaint to google…
Trial converts to a charge
BEWARE!!! I paid for a one-time service ONLY. The merchant automatically enrolled me into a subscription without my explicit consent or clear disclosure. EDIT AFTER THEIR RESPONSE: NO, it was not stated upfront. Also, I only agreed to pay…
had to report charges for fraud because I got charged an extra 20$ immediately almost I didn't authorize nor was made aware of in a proper manor, suddenly they charged me for what idk hadn't been signed up for 5 min before suddenly my 1$…
I tried the free trial, unsubscribed before the trials end and was still charged $30.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Got charged 19.99 EUR without agreeing to it! I agreed to 1 EUR. it deducted it than I pressed continue and it deducted another 19.99. SCAM!!! and no way to contact support or dispute charge in app. Stay away! I was contacted by support…
Worst app i found on playstore and just a time waste and most irrelevant app and just fake marketing
Bait and switch — I took one test they asked me how much I wanted to pay I said 1€ then the next thing I know I’m charged 14.99€ complete bait and switch now they won’t refund me my money I never signed up for a subscription
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.