Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,367 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.25.23 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.25.23, updated 2026-09-16.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.25.22 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.25.22, updated 2026-08-28.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
The forced ads every minute or two of clicking when buying anything ruined it. Could only play for an hour, if it did not have that I probably would have played for weeks easily. Forced ads ruin every game they are a part of.
I purchased the 7 day ad free at the end of August. I sent in a ticket as i was still seeing ads appear. Support was good and replied and i had my question clarified. I purchased the permanent ad removal at the end of August and the…
Good game, but the amount of ads are ridiculous. I fully accept that ads will be part of the game, as it's a free game, but it's ridiculous. Every 30 seconds is just too much. To make it worse, I even tried to purchase the lifetime of ad…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
SCAM.. game itself is decently enjoyable. The ADs are insane, not the ads you can choose for boosts, rewards, etc. the FORCED ADS. ads for navigating through the game, for selling stock, buying used cars, so MANY ADS.. have already…
Boring, annoying , false adds
the game is nothing like the ads that promote it. the amount of ads incorporated in the game is absolutely insane and you literally cannot do anything without watching a series of ads. then they place ads all over the screen so you can…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.