We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 3.3.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.3.0, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Terrible — Does not work. Makes it difficult to unsubscribe. All recordings are on their servers not your phone.
Won’t let me cancel — Scam scam scam won’t let me cancel. No way to do it on the app and no communication from customer support
Scam — You cannot use the app without setting up a free trail. That’s fine but you cannot cancel the free trail through the app, you have to email support. Okay fine, but they emailed back stating I need to give them a reason before they…
Trial converts to a charge
Charge me before the free trial even started — I have a very important call that I need to record so I downloaded this app to try out the three day free trial soon as I accepted the free trial. They instantly charged me the $12.99 plus…
Scammed by this developer — I was offered a 3 -day trial on 8/14/2026. I accepted the 3-day trial. Instead of the trial I was charged instantly. I reported the problem to Apple within minutes of the charge. I was told after they told me…
It’s a scam Don’t try it — It says 3 days free trial but it was a lie they charge me $12.99 and I didn’t even use it and they refused my refund application
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.