We scanned 207 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
No ad complaints
Great. Simple. + one enhancement idea — The app is exactly what it advertises to be. Free, no ads, easy to use and set up, allows barcode scanning. Enhancement idea for the developers: either 1) integrate with Apple Health (sending and…
Great for someone just starting out — This is a great tracker for someone just starting out and isn’t looking to get too deep in the weeds. No ads, ease of use. I like the added weight tracking as well. The set up was simple too, just…
Freeeee — Completely free no ads. Wish it had a way to take pictures of nutrition labels
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.