We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.6.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.6.3, updated 2026-08-06.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
WHY ADDS??? — TOO MANY ADDS BRO 😭
There’s problems — 2 thing: 1, it’s making me pay for the app just so I can look at it 2 it has way to many ads
Worst app ever :( — So I downloaded this app thinking that I could find out who my celebrity match was. Well I thought wrong! Because of 3 things: A, as soon as I loaded in it said get premium. But I could X it out but when I tried to…
Paywall blocks the basics
This app sucks I only put five stars so u see it — U have to pay for everything and everyone who is doesn't have to pay the owners like but this app actually sucks don't download it it sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks sucks…
Hate this app — Hate this because you have to pay for everything and I’m not that rich. This subscription is taken away my family’s money or not that rich one star Dev please fix it.
I hate this — Ok so on the ad it said it was free and I was like ok but then when I started it didn’t show me what it looked like. It just said what percentage I looked like them. But on the ad It said download this and see what’s…
Trial converts to a charge
3 day free trial is a lie — I accessed the 3 day free trial and as I when to do it, it charged me for the whole month! This is no ok at all because I didn’t want to purchase it until I tried it and after I tried it I didn’t want the app…
Soooo bad — It says trial ends on Aug 17 but we got charged now
Scammed — This was supposed to be a free trial and as soon as I downloaded it I was charged $14.99, immediately asked for a refund by email and no one has responded. Had I known it was gonna charge for the download I would have never done…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 4 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.