We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.121 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.121, updated 2026-09-24.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Can’t do the free trial without agreeing to future payment — Free trial requires using apple pay and agreeing to being charged in 3 days unless you cancel instead of the app simply being time limited so you can try without having to jump…
Zero stars — This does not follow prompts even remotely closely, resulting in a lackluster product. Cancelling in app is impossible. Buckle up.
To hard to use — Almost impossible to cancel a subscription.
Trial converts to a charge
Can’t do the free trial without agreeing to future payment — Free trial requires using apple pay and agreeing to being charged in 3 days unless you cancel instead of the app simply being time limited so you can try without having to jump…
Worst AI to date — Three day free trial charge me $32.42 Scammed from the beginning. constantly asking to upgrade. This is by far the worst app ever
Scam — Please do not download this app I downloaded for free trial cancelled immediately and I can’t get them to stop trying to charge me you can’t get ahold of any kind of support
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
STOLE MY MONEY — I PAID FOR THIS APP FOR A YEARLY PLAN AND IT KEEPS ASKING ME TO RESTORE MY SUBSCRIPTION!! I’m unable to use this apps full capacity with all features!! I emailed them once and they denied my request. I emailed them a…
Pro license does nothing — I pay for pro and it says unlimited messages but every time I try and chat, I get a pop up to buy pro. I ALREADY BOUGHT PRO. waste of money.
Easy to use from my iPhone except… — I really enjoy using this app and rely on it daily for both creative tasks and professional business communication. The "creative thinker" and "legal" modes have been particularly helpful for drafting…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.