Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 1,757 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.1.48 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.1.48, updated 2026-09-26.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.0.68 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.0.68, updated 2026-09-29.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 4
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Enjoyed the game until the ads after every level. Became tedious so I deleted it. Started game again to give benefit of the doubt. Lost the will to live by level 150. Ad after every level, sorry, not paying £6.50 to get rid of the ads…
I really enjoyed the game until after lvl 20 ads popped up even though I only selected the coin option post level. The ads never gave me the option to return to the game so I had to close the app and restart it. Then, after lvl 23, the…
Very quickly ramps up ads, from one every few levels to one every level to forcing mid-level ads on you while you're playing. Just another copy-cat ad farm. There are dozens better than this elsewhere.
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Enjoyed the game until the ads after every level. Became tedious so I deleted it. Started game again to give benefit of the doubt. Lost the will to live by level 150. Ad after every level, sorry, not paying £6.50 to get rid of the ads…
I absolutely love this game and play it every day! 😄 Even when I run out of lives, I watch a video to keep playing 🙃. The game is a great mix of easy and challenging levels, and I appreciate the support tools for Super Hard levels. One…
Fun but it’s filled with ads, art theft, and AI — The base gameplay is fun; it’s a puzzle game where you select the colors in the correct order to solve the puzzle and get to watch ants take apart pixel art block by block with fun little…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
The game is OK but it occasionally randomly pops up ads in the middle of game play and some of the ads are intentionally misleading and designed to look like system warnings rather than honest advertisements, and who knows what it's…
ads every few levels. banner ads on the bottom. nothing like the ads they portrayed in other games.
Starts mildly fun, then becomes annoying — The app begins mildly fun, and then quickly becomes annoying as they lock one of the key quality of life features, the speed up button, behind an adwall. It's a bait-and-switch in extremely poor…
Pay to progress
Fun while it's lasted. Once you reach a certain level, the game will make it very impossible to advance without spending. Like others are saying, it will bypass certain colors until you get stuck even though it could be easily removed to…
pay to win. get to lvl 80 no matter what you do your not winning unless you use a bonus
It's a fun game, however like almost every game of this type some of the are too much. I'm not here to play a game where I'm forced to pay money to advance, or at least as much as this one costs. I play to relax or pass the time, not…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.