Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 452 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 4.6.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.7.0, updated 2026-10-01.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 4.6.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 4.7.0 · 2026-10-01
No release notes were provided for this version.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
game started out pretty fun. I usually like Rollic games a decent amount. unfortunately, this one has way too many ads, even when you choose not to get any bonus. Then, if you ever get stuck on a level, the ads disappear entirely and you…
I'm on level 162. I enjoy the game and it's addictive. I was annoyed with all the ads so I ended up purchasing the no ads because I really enjoy the game. but now after a level when it asks you if you want to just take the coins out use…
I'm currently on level 4271, so obviously I enjoy the game, it can be fun and challenging and kind of addicting. My complaint is having to watch an ad after EVERY level, some of them are super short but a lot of them are repetitive and…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
I played a game exactly like this before and beat every level. It's too easy. However, it wasn't the game advertised when I was playing a different game. False Advertising is a crime, no? And I played 20 levels in 5mins to be sure. The ad…
what ever developer put the ads in this one needs to loose their job.so does the groups ceo. repeating the same ad after every level. fake ads at that. you want money put it on patreon like everyone els. and if your team or google play…
not the same as the adds. you gotta get ppl in the vehicles. not what was advertised and not what I wanted
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.