We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.30.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-07 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.30.1, updated 2026-08-21.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Price keeps rising
Prices Keep Going Up! — Price on the Machine is lower than the price on this app. I moved to a new apartment 6 months ago, since then the price for a wash has gone from 1.75 to 2.75. Also, the Machines are old and dirty.
Machines don’t work too well. — Getting too expensive. Price just went up. 2.73 almost 3.00 is diabolical.
Horrible app avoid this company if possible — Such a greedy company that keeps raising prices now it’s 2.50 for every washer you use and 2.50 for every dryer so 5 bucks every time minimum. Also have a “convenience fee” for payments of 5…
Reports of unexpected charges
No refund required after all — There’s water in there to wash your clothes with but you pay for it and I appreciate the water It keeps your machines from being destroyed because nobody is micromanaging who is loading and what they’re…
Awful — Wouldn’t use it if I didn’t have to. Will take money from you and not add to the time on the dryer- they won’t refund. No one to get in contact with. Washer AND dryer constantly broken. Dryer needs to be ran multiple times to dry…
Just terrible — Have been double charged multiple times and no refund has ever been issued despite my requests. My preloaded funds have been deleted now three times as well totaling nearly $40. Machines constantly not working for one…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.