We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 7.1.16 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.1.16, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
interesting concept — i'm not sure how i feel about this app yet. it's an interesting concept where it lets AI try to find someone based off the initial like quiz i guess, of what you're looking for. however,, the search range is…
Horrible and false advertising — Worst dating app I’ve ever seen and they actual lied in their advertising and signup with fake profiles it looks like liked you (pick from these 3) to get you to pay and then those people don’t even exist…
No way to get past the membership screen — There is a back button at the top of the screen that is unusable. It is truly a bait and switch app. You can’t do anything on here without paying. Not a single thing.
Paywall with no way past it
Not Worth It — You can’t use the app without paying. Unless you’re only interested in meeting people who live in other states, pay for a different app.
Paid service only — You cannot use the app without paying for a subscription. You can’t even delete your account as at one point the UI only gives you one option, which is to pay for a subscription. You have to email them to delete your…
Cannot use without paying — Just to hopefully help out some people who aren’t aware of this before signing up like I wasn’t, they “review” your profile for 7-10 days before even letting you join, and once your profile is approved you are…
Paywall blocks the basics
terrible — for starters, everything costs money; now that’s already annoying, but the fact that my first “matches” were thousands of miles away is already another reason for me to leave. the amount that is charged for the services…
Not free — Completely paid. You can’t do anything without paying the egregious subscription fee.
Can’t delete profile. — I just started using this dating and they didn’t tell me you have to pay for a membership to even use the app or even talk to someone. Now I can’t delete my account.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.