What’s the catch? Hard to cancel — reported by 33 users.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 2.45.86 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.45.86, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Tried to cancel — This is a horrible app tried to cancel the app still was billed hate this
Can’t cancel my subscription and there stealing my money — I already cancel my subscription and it keeps charging me this is scam and it says it’s going to keep chafing me till 2027
Can’t cancel subscription — I canceled my subscription months ago but somehow I am locked into a contract until next year. For some reason it’s impossible to cancel. I called my bank and everything and they are still taking money from me…
Reports of unexpected charges
Tried to cancel — This is a horrible app tried to cancel the app still was billed hate this
Scammed — Scammed into yearly subscription, company stopped responding to email requests to cancel as well.
Fix Your App — I an trying to log in on my Apple TV and it says I have an incorrect password, I do not. When you update your password online as well it does not update, watch they are scamming your money.
Price keeps rising
Price gouging galore — DAZN is a fine app if you’re glad to pay extra for a lot of random sports in one app. They do however price gouge you for that privilege. For instance, want Rally TV? You’ll pay more on DAZN than by simply ordering…
Subscription — I been trying to cancel the membership for over a year and they make it so difficult for people to cancel and now not only can’t cancel I got a price increase they are stilling peoples money
Was perfect until… — DAZN was awesome Perfect platform Until the okie doke of ppv and raised prices for “premium” content(ppv) Was supposed to be different from ppv But all these app models are the same ol same in new clothes So, typical…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Bait and switch. — Joined this app when it first launched, $17.99 a month, no pay per views, a boxing fan's dream. Fast forward 10 years later and we're at $35.99 a month with club shows in gymnasiums as the included content and every…
False Advertising — Terrible, unavailable and false advertising
Bait and Switch — I choose the monthly subscription. I read the page before payment clearly. It said; “Cancel anytime with a 30-day notice. I logged in and saw that I was subscribed for a year with no option to cancel. I chatted with a…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.