We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 26.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.0.0, updated 2026-09-16.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
$5 a month? You’re crazy — Great app but limiting people to 3 folders and then charging monthly…what? You’re not providing any service other than the app which seems vibe coded so why is there no one-time purchase option? I’d rather it be…
Fantastic app — Would be 5 star if it was just a one time purchase and not a subscription service. I understand it’s the current trend
Please Never Take This Away From Me🙏🙏 — I have been searching for a way to track and sort my hundreds of cards ever since coming back to the hobby and this app is the best I’ve found yet! The interface is well designed and easy to…
Paywall blocks the basics
Genuinely the perfect app! HOWEVER!!! — I LOVE this app. I was using Collectr for the longest time, and my friend showed me this app- and I loved it! The layout is really intuitive, I oove the way everything is organized… it’s all really…
Bulk adding — Super great app, love the ui, but adding a lot of cards to the collection at once is tedious without the scanner, locked behind a subscription. Maybe I’m just being stingy
This is a great app for collectors — I’ve used this app for a few months by now, and it’s really nice to have to see what I do and don’t have, it’s also nice for seeing the prices. My one and only complaint is that almost everything you…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.