Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 1,856 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.113.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.113.0, updated 2026-09-17.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.113.0.38839 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.113.0.38839, updated 2026-09-15.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
😎 This Game is very fun. Staff Brilliant. I am occasional small spender and rely heavily on Ads. I find if you cant spend or watch ads game actually becomes quite unplayable I don't have a great deal of money to spend to keep up. I truly…
more stars can be bought for $5.99. oh, you didn't like that price? well I'll also sell you a pack of stars for $35. oh you didn't like that? well here's a pop-up ad for a subscription for $3.99/month. oh you didn't like that? well here's…
Crashes Within Minutes — Game is fine when you first download and play it. Aside from pop up adds, seems solid. However, the further you play in regards to how many kingdoms you complete (I’m on 108) the games lags a lot and willl crash…
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Game or cash grab? every 3-4 minutes multiple pop ups pop up asking to buy this, buy that, and when you close one pop up another, and then another, usually around 5 pop ups in a row telling you buy things like top offs, dice rolls, piggy…
I enjoy playing this game but am considering uninstalling it now. It constantly begs for money and the packaged available to buy are expensive, many over £50. Most prizes in the game are impossible to achieve within time limits unless…
Awesome Game! — This is my favorite game on my phone! They give you plenty chances to win, I do get annoyed with the pop ups to buy things, I have to X out of 4 pop ups that try to sell you stuff constantly, and I do buy things, I’m up to…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.