We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 4.265.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.265.0, updated 2026-09-28.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Tracking and data collection concerns
This could be a mobile site — Forcing an app download to access tickets is asinine. Ticket access should be available through the mobile site. This feels predatory and opportunistic: I want to see one show that a close friend plays in…
Why do I need an app for this — The app works just fine. The app itself is not my issue. Why, on god’s green earth, do I need - as the website states - NEED - the DICE app to attend a show. I saw as a response to another review that you…
Dislike the privacy policy. — Downloaded the app because that’s the only way to update my email address but the app permissions include rights to sell my contact info. So, instead up updating my email to one I actually pay attention to…
Reports of unexpected charges
Worst Third Party — Can’t access my ticket the day of the concert and their email team is unresponsive. Cant call anyone since they don’t publicly share a customer phone number. Also can’t request a refund because their app lost the…
Inconvenient — A friend of mine couldn’t make it to the concert. And we are unable to get a refund, resell the ticket, or transfer the ticket to the waitlist due to the way the company has it set up. The fact that I can’t even transfer…
SCAM APP!! — Greedy scam app. Use it all the time and they won’t offer a refund on tickets I literally just bought by accident when I am a loyal customer that uses Dice all the time. They can’t just offer a simple refund for an event…
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.