We scanned 400 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
No ad complaints
So good I bought it twice, both on PC and mobile for on-the-go while I was stuck in the hospital. I will probably buy this game for my friends in the future bc the devs deserve more money than they're asking for. This game is excellent as…
Best game I've played on my phone! I just finished the last challenge I had left, after beating all episodes + bonus episodes. I picked it up as a time killer and ended up playing full hours-long play sessions of it. No ads, fun game play…
One if not *the* best mobile game I've ever played. I thought subsequent runs for each character would be boring stat increases to enemies and boring affix-like mechanics, and while some of the episodes do have elements similar to the 2…
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.