Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 425 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 2.1.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.1.3, updated 2026-09-17.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertising, on the store it says single player. And until level 50, it is. But then it turns into a copy of all the "survival" games out there, shields and bases on the world map and resources to fight over. If it was just the…
If you're interested in playing either the joystick-based game or the tower defense one in the ads, don't bother. They aren't part of the normal gameplay loop, and I don't even know if there's some kind of hidden minigames or something…
it is nothing like the ad, and the pictures go along with the ads, but the gameplay is plain boring and uninstalled
Pay to progress
When I first downloaded the game I was really having a ton of fun I mean...literally became a hyperfixation for me. I was just genuinely enjoying the game. But the last few updates? They have essentially taken the game and said "How much…
such a different game for the current times of ai/idle and ads every 5 second games on the market. I'm in so much love with the mechanics, looks and overall Interactives and activities. I highly recommend this game for people who need…
This is not a cute dino breeding game. it is a tribe war game with breeding aspects. sure you can play just to get cute dinos but thay is only a part of the game. The tribe part of this game is p2w. You will constantly get raided by…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.