Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
It's a pretty fun game, but it's very much a pay to win game unfortunately, at this point. The banners hardly ever give abilities for the characters intended. Also, Sqex is not nearly generous enough with rewards (especially mog coins…
Another P2W. Not F2P friendly. Just who ever is stronger (credit card). If you spend a lot of money you won't lose. Little to no rewards. Drop rates are atrocious. Season passes are horrible. Matches take a bit to even get into. They…
This game is extremely pay to win and I wouldn't recommend trying it is the short version. You basically have to roll for your characters kit. For nearly everyone its required. You want dupes because its tied to your stats. low stats, bad…
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.