We scanned 400 user reviews and found no recurring complaint patterns. Not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reviewers report clear pricing
Had to edit it once the ads got added. I don't mind a one-time payment for an app, I would pay for it gladly, but a subscription model is not something I would do. The 2 minute ads whenever I look at it for 18+ content is not something im…
I used this app for a couple of years and loved it. Frequent updates, responsive customer service, and all the functionality I wanted. Unfortunately I deleted it this morning after they implemented ads. Suggestion: instead of a…
There's only a handful of dividend specific trackers. This is one of the better ones for sure. Please add a one-time payment option instead of a subscription and add sectors and industries to the chart page 😄
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.