What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.113.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.113.5, updated 2026-09-30.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.113.5 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.113.5, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Playable ads are ruining my enjoyment. You have to watch ads to achieve all of the daily and weekly tasks. The playable ads are crashing the game 3 out of 4 times now. I have uninstalled and reinstalled the game, and I don't have an old…
So many ads! Let my 7 year old try this (with my supervision) because he loves Dragons of Wrenly and Wings of Fire and there aren't that many dragon games for kids out there. Nope - he was very quick to ask for all the other apps that get…
this ad junk is getting ridiculous! after the last update the game is both freezing and not giving me my rewards. I try playing ads to get the rewards but the screen goes black or freezes on an ad. I have to restart and get nothing. try…
Pay to progress
I really like this game and Ive been playing it for a super long time (I've never bought ANYTHING at ALL) so let me tell you some downsides, it's very pay to win and that's irritating, dragon riders get ALL the good stuff, it's very very…
Pretty well put together game for the most part, but the game does feel extremely pay to win, lots of exciting or unique features are locked behind a pay wall and then theres the combat. The fighting in the game is so bad. You'll have…
pay to win game, why the village time to buy the bridge take 3 hours????
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.