What’s the catch? Multiple ad networks bundled — measured, backed by SDKs in the app package.
Analyzed automatically from 6 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
App Store
This analysis describes version 2.6.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.6.6, updated 2026-09-21.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 2.1.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.1.9, updated 2026-09-17.
What the analysis found
The catch list 3
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Dropping a star cause of all the ads. You can't compete in anything cause ads in between every board puts you behind so you don't have a chance. Loved this game, the girl and dog are so cute, and the fighter jet is awesome, but they've…
games fun but way too many ads. seems like after every level you have to watch an ad. gets old very quick. game is more fun than royal Kingdom but royal Kingdom has way fewer ads. an ad every 3 to 4 levels would be a whole lot better. as…
The ads are relentless! If you win a round-watch and ad, extra moves (a must) - watch an ad, double rewards-watch an ad. I can understand some ads, but after and during each round is too much, especially if you are in a timed competition!…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertising... no ads? no force buying stuff? both are lies. if you dont want ads you have to pay. That right there contradicts there false advertising. Not a bad game but dont lie to people to download your game. idiots
Good game....false advertisement I like many many others downloaded this game because it was promoted as having "no ads". And there may be fewer ads than most games, but there is definitely not "no ads". I am not interested in hearing how…
the ads for your game is misleading it says that there are no ads.
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.