Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-05 from 844 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.31.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.31.2, updated 2026-10-02.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.31.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 1.31.2 · 2026-10-02
Our icon got a glow-up and gameplay feels smoother than ever. Dive in and enjoy!
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.31.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.31.2, updated 2026-09-30.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
quite a good game but too many ads and level is too difficult with the time limit. give up at level 109. uninstall, and bye.
Sadly one of those games that offers you the chance to watch a video after every round to double your reward, but when you click no, forces you to watch the video, and doesn't give you double the reward. anyway. Each round takes less time…
Amazing game. Every now and then new stages and mechanics are introduced keeping us engaged. Good for timepass and mind work. Improvements can be done - Too much Ads, can be reduced to after every 2-3 stages or so. Also the energy we get…
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
I like the game but the timers are getting too short and it's recently started crashing a lot while I'm playing and then obviously I've lost a life when I go back in which is incredibly irritating when I'm about to complete a level then…
I really enjoy this game but im upset that I cant save my progress to Facebook or log in. I may stop playing because if I ever have to get a new phone, I would have to start over. Next issue, it takes awhile for lives to restore. For the…
minimizes and restarts constantly. 80% of the time gives no hearts for watching ads. when free time is active, game crashes. have gotten 8-10 min for 15 min free time, 3 min and never played due to crashes for 2 out of last 3 times. lose…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.