We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 3.2.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.2.0, updated 2026-09-05.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Impossible to cancel — I used this for a short time and it served its purpose. Though didn’t work quite as I needed. So I canceled and 4 years later they are still charging me. Buyer beware.
Scam — No way to cancel your 7 day free trial before it is up and charges you for a year. App also just doesn’t work.
Company is badly managed — I was not going to leave a review, but wow. So I downloaded this app to see if I can make it to work with just a monitor. I didn’t think so, but wanted to try anyway. Once you confirm your email, takes you to a…
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False Advertising — Description says a monthly subscription is available for air and starter tiers however there is no way to initiate the subscription as annual and lifetime seem to be the only options. I don’t want to pay an annual for…
Bait and switch. — Mandatory email sign up. No app until you have an account. Then you find out it’s subscription based? For a display?? Shady business practices. It’s not the subscription itself, it’s the obfuscation.
Bait and switch — Bought the app when they didn’t require an account. Then they hold the app hostage until you sign up. Plenty more apps on the market that are way less shady.
Paywall blocks the basics
Really??? — So I got this app to use my iPad as a drawing tablet and everything costs money so I got this app to draw buuut… it costs money to use gestures boooooo. Please change ╏ : ◉ ∧ ◉ : ╏
You’ll never stop oatibg — They took $50 my money and Apple won’t refund. i have no use for this product as my iPad was returned. This product used to be a one time purchase now you have to pay monthly/yearly to have the privilege to keep…
Paid for Pro but now have to pay more... — Or so I thought. Duet support reached out to me and was able to remedy the issue. Thanks!
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.