DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
EPIK - AI Photo & Video Editor
SNOW Corporation · Photo & Video

Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-06 from 933 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

Analyzed automaticallyConfidence: Medium3 signal sources933 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-06
 Which version this describes

App Store

This analysis describes version 7.4.30 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.4.30, updated 2026-09-23.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 7.4.31 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.4.31, updated 2026-10-01.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
Reported by 33 usersReported by users, not measured — nothing we can inspect could show this either wayview evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Raised by 33 distinct reviewers — 6.5% of the 508 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 5

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.4% of 425 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Trial converts to a charge
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
What we saw: Trial converts to a charge: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (1.8% of 508 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Hard to cancel: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 508 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 508 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the store privacy disclosure.view evidence
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (5 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Paywall blocks the basics

I would have rated this app 5 stars if it wasn't for the new update. This app used to be my go to photo editting app but ever since the last update everything that used to be free is now pro which doesn't let you use more than half of the…

4★ · Google Play · 2025-10-20

A perfectly good app, except EVERYTHING that used to be free is now locked behind a subscription. Can't even watch an ad to use them once or something. Useless now. Everyone uninstall this app. I would put 0 stars if I could.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-15

Use to be free now EVERYTHING IS PAID!!! I've been using this app for literally like the past 8 to 10 years. And everything use to be free and worked fine. Now almost EVERYTHING on the app is paid or Subscription only! Worst thing ever…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-31

Aggressive ad load

A perfectly good app, except EVERYTHING that used to be free is now locked behind a subscription. Can't even watch an ad to use them once or something. Useless now. Everyone uninstall this app. I would put 0 stars if I could.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-15

too many ads

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-18

Pop-up adds hijack your phone.

1★ · Google Play · 2026-07-23

Trial converts to a charge

I was charged.. — I bought this app for free to use the free trial 1 week to edit my photos background. However when I deleted the app when I was done after the one week free trial I was charged 51.99 dollars for the pro version! I didn’t…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-16

don’t get the free trial — i downloaded the app and used the free trial for 7days and i cancelled before hand and they still charged me $56.

1★ · App Store · 2024-12-15

Charged me for a free trial — I signed up for the 7 day free trial before the year subscription and they charged me $11? I never even confirmed a purchase for that amount.

1★ · App Store · 2024-09-11

Hard to cancel

Scam — Won’t let me unsubscribe when I found out they don’t have the feature I needed.

1★ · App Store · 2024-08-15

WONT LET ME CANCEL FREE TRIAL — This app offered me a free trial but literally just tried to make me pay already when the free trial isn’t even over!!! I don’t recommend trying that free trial !

2★ · App Store · 2024-05-26

worst app ever — apple wont let me download any apps and keeps saying theres a problem with my billing error and its all because this app wont let me unsubscribe and wants to charge me for a subscription that isnt supposed to renew till…

1★ · App Store · 2024-05-07

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Usage limit?? — Why the hell did I pay $9.99 for a MONTH of pro as advertised, then the pro features reached their “usage limit” on the first day of me using it, meaning I can’t use the pro features until NEXT MONTH. This is ridiculous…

1★ · App Store · 2026-07-13

Terrible — This app is terrible and such a money grab. Everything on this app requires “pro” which costs money. At this point just charge people for the app in general rather than wasting my time downloading it just to realize i have to…

1★ · App Store · 2026-06-23

False advertisement — False advertising

1★ · App Store · 2025-08-06

What this app sells

Every purchase the store discloses. Store listing
 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-06 Version analyzed: 7.4.30 (App Store), 7.4.31 (Google Play)3 independent signals933 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.