Review signals only — 1 user-reported signal — from user reviews, not yet audited by Appworthy.
Reported by users
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
Can't even play because the game bugged and keeps telling me to choose a TV logo when I try to book the monthly P4V, but that's fine, I'm not having any fun anyways. They've made this game such a blatant and overt P2W cashgrab it's vile…
I was a little annoyed at having cards I couldn't use UNTIL I finished my first year. The different Eras is pretty cool. The game is enjoyable and even grindy, it works. Yea, you can P2W for packs but it's not necessary. It's enjoyable…
pay to win or grind till you die very disappointed that they chose to go this route.
What this app sells
How a review signal works
A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.
A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.
It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.
A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.