Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 456 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 0.11.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 0.11.5, updated 2026-09-09.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
The version available on crazygames was a lot of fun, so I gave it a try on my phone. Here the ads are horrible, so time consuming and they all try to trick you into downloading much worse games, all ad-driven slop. I always delete games…
(edit) Shout out to Aurecas games Been playing this game with my wife since July 8th and we both bought the 18.99 package for collecting boss loot without watching ads. we both watched 250 ads and said okay let's buy a package. we also…
Ads are absolutely brutal. Each run makes you watch multiple 2-5 MINUTE unskippable ads, and there are points in the game that are clearly designed to kill you to force you to watch another ad, such as a (Non Boss) wace that is impossible…
Pay to progress
First and foremost: You must pay to win. if not, the grind is over 10 times longer...and there's a hell of a grind. paying unlocks triple rewards and 5x playing speed with no ads. It's not worth it. Second: The game has a wave skip option…
I had this game for a while now, placed among other games that I actively play. I was looking forward to going back to it knowing I've had made some progress in it. I thought I'd read reviews right before jumping back, and wow. Too many…
after you play for a little they SWAMP you with ads, and you literally cannot advance without them. progression is very slow, and honestly makes the game not enjoyable at all. I ended up getting a bug where the monsters attack you but you…
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.