We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 2.95 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.95, updated 2026-09-27.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 6
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Aggressive ad load
Can’t even use basic features — Too many ads and doesn’t let basic features to save without watermark
review — Too much advertisement, wich make people uninstall.
Yeah, no — Not impressed. A lot of Commercials!!!
Trial converts to a charge
Refund — Very disappointed with the billing practices. I cancelled the subscription on the LAST DAY of the free trial specifically because I did not want to be charged. Despite cancelling before the trial ended, I was still charged for…
BUYER BEWARE: Charged me even though I cancelled free trial immediately — Wanted to try it out. Signed up for free trial but before I did anything I went and cancelled subscription. Today I was charged $7.99. I go to look at my…
Charged for free trial — I downloaded the app on a free trial, it wasn’t suitable for what I needed so I cancelled the trial the same day but I was still charged. Not happy!
Hard to cancel
Free Trial — Unable to cancel free trial-looked under Apple subscriptions and in the app itself it doesn’t recognize the trial subscription.
Did not let me unsubscribe — Very dissatisfied with my experience with the app. I was not able to cancel it even after I wrote several emails explaining my situation. They charged me 50 dollars even after I had send my emails. I just want…
Not user friendly — Features aren’t good. Not user friendly. Hard to cancel subscription
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
False advertising — I followed an IG advert showing this app could generate different hair styles and hair colours. Download the app, subscribed (7 days free trial) and turns out it doesn’t have this feature.
False advertising — The app is great, but I decided to canceled my subscription when the 7 days free trial was NOT yet over because I thought it was too expensive for what it is but they still charged me for the whole year.
False advertisement — The ad for this app on facebook had a video where the woman changed her hair colour live with very convincing colours. You download the app and you find that it the hair colour change feature works only on saved…
Paywall blocks the basics
ONE STAR! — This is horrible . Everything is premium and you can’t even take screenshots either, the worst app ever I do not recommend wasting your time to edit a gorgeous photo of you guys! I will find another app because clearly this…
Usless app — Nothing is for free you have to pay for everything dont download this app
Paywall everything — What’s the point when everything is behind a paywall? Just shameless cash grab
Reports of unexpected charges
UNAUTHORIZED CHARGES — I received an unauthorized charge direct to my debit, the app bypassed the apple subscription.
Refund — Very disappointed with the billing practices. I cancelled the subscription on the LAST DAY of the free trial specifically because I did not want to be charged. Despite cancelling before the trial ended, I was still charged for…
Don’t subscribe — My daughter accidentally subscribed. Refused a refund. Read previous the same thing
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 10 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.