We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 1.44 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.44, updated 2026-07-04.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 5
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Notifications don’t work — Was really excited about this app but despite deleting and reinstalling, restarting my phone, having everyone in my group do these things, and making sure notifications are on for everyone, this app won’t send a…
False advertising — Ya
They do not unsubscribe you. False advertising. — Purchased based on finding phone number locations as advertised. Was not what was needed nor advertised. I’ve taken the necessary consumer rights actions to unsubscribe to automatic…
Trial converts to a charge
Horrible — It doesnt do as advertised & why do they make it do difficult to cancel subscription? Plus they stated free trial but still charged!
This app is terrible — Worst app ever if there was an option for zero stars, I would put zero. When you download this app, it says “free trial” but it instantly charges you $8.99 telling you it’s on sale from $52.99 and when you try to…
You charged me for a free trial?! — This app charged me even after I canceled my subscription. I downloaded the app but couldn’t connect it to my daughter’s phone. Then, I noticed that Apple already had a way to connect to her phone using…
Hard to cancel
Horrible — It doesnt do as advertised & why do they make it do difficult to cancel subscription? Plus they stated free trial but still charged!
Got scammed — Had accidentally tap this app that had popped up on my instagram then had charged me and not knowing it would charge my $56 dollars more no trying to get refund but it won’t let me cancel the subscription any where totally a…
Scam — Absolutely terrible I got the subscription and decided it was not gonna work out went to cancel it, but it is almost impossible to cancel, this app is a absolute awful scam, I’m looking forward to suing if I don’t get my money back.
Reports of unexpected charges
Do not get — It’s a scam & was a waste of my money & time.
This app is terrible — Worst app ever if there was an option for zero stars, I would put zero. When you download this app, it says “free trial” but it instantly charges you $8.99 telling you it’s on sale from $52.99 and when you try to…
This app stole my money? — This app is a scam with hidden fees and no disclosures. I downloaded this app but then immediately deleted it. I never used the services! This app has stole over $50 and attempted to steal over $200 from me! I…
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Show 5 more purchases we couldn’t categorise
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.