We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.
This analysis describes version 12.13.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 12.13.4, updated 2026-09-11.
What the analysis found
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Upgrade prompts use guilt-trip wording
Not Great — It says that the network is unsecured but not why. Constantly pushing for upgrades even when subscribed to “Premium”. I can get the same info from free tools.
Was good — This app was useful, but requires a 6.99 sub just to scan my network now? Can’t scan once a day, as stated by the “24 hour cooldown” without a popup informing me to pay up. 👎
What was once great — What was once an elegant app to get a quick overview of your devices has turned into an interface nightmare and constant nagging for yet another subscription, which is really completely unwarranted considering what…
Paywall blocks the basics
Used to be useful — Used to be a great tool, now it’s just a cash grab for the developers. Uninstalled after 12+ years of using the app. The free version is basically unusable for tech support.
Scam/pay to use — It does show who/what is connected to your Wi-Fi but you can only REFRESH 3 times then you have to PAY for more plus some of the simple features like removing someone and on top of that it won’t let you register at all…
One scan a day is all you get — Used to be free, now all you get is a single network scan per day for free
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.