What’s the catch? Nothing we could corroborate against this app.
Analyzed automatically from 3 independent signals that had to agree — not a hands-on test, and not human-reviewed.
This analysis describes version 24.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 24.1, updated 2026-09-30.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 24.0, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Version 24.1 · 2026-09-30
Bug fixes and performance improvements
What the analysis found
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Hard to cancel
Super shady!!! Do not download!!! — I downloaded the app, started the three day trial and then decided that it was not a good fit for me. When I went to cancel it, it was almost impossible. The website states that you either cancel it…
Can’t unsubscribe — I just got charged for a new year’s subscription, but there is no way in the app to cancel and no way to contact the company to cancel the subscription. It isn’t handled by Apple so can’t cancel in the normal way…
CANT CANCEL — I got the free trial of this app, but I did not want to proceed with the membership, this app has no option to cancel membership within app, or even through the website. I couldn’t even cancel it through my…
Reports of unexpected charges
Fraud — They advertise membership programs with a “free” 3 day trial and say you can cancel anytime but there’s no way to actually cancel it. No matter what you do, delete your account, cancel, etc. they will still charge you. DO NOT…
DO NOT EVER GET THIS APP — I pressed the week FREE trial, cancelled it before it ended because I couldn’t understand the app.. a day after my birthday they all all my birthday money $100* out of my account. I made a dispute the following…
Will not cancel after free trial — Continues to bill after free trial. Canceled before the free trail was over.
Trial converts to a charge
Do not download this app it is a scam — I signed up for a free trial but the app automatically charged me $100 for a year. Do not sign up for a free trial.
No unsubscribe button — I downloaded Fitness AI to compare it to the paid tiers of Fitbod and Hevy, and decided not to proceed with this app because it’s not differentiating enough from the others for the higher subscription fee, and I…
Scammers — The don’t you option to cancel free trial so they can charge you $89 scammers
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.