Analyzed automatically. Assessed 2026-10-04 from 504 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
This analysis describes version 27.0.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 27.0.2, updated 2026-09-11.
What the analysis found
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
What reviewers said
Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.
Pay to progress
3 energy isn't enough to do anything without spending money and the 8hrs. Overalls and stats don't matter because the more you build you team and increase your overall you start losing far more game than you win especially against teams…
So the game thought it was a good idea to match a league of 80 ovr teams with 1 88 ovr team whos 14-0 right now. i just decided to delete my account and restart as this games repetitive and pay to win. theres no point in playing if every…
peak but is kinda pay to win but I've never spent money and I'm goated fun a very very very fun grind I suggest you install and enjoy the journey
Progress pauses until you wait or pay
Game is fun at first. Then you get to a plateau where you cannot advance any further unless you pay for energy lightning bolts, stamina bottles and gold bars. Basically a pay to advance play game and not worth the investment. I would not…
My biggest complaint is how slow energy is replenished. One energy every 8 hours is terrible. If you're unable to complete missions, you can only play 5 meaningful games a day (includes the daily league game and the one ad per day you can…
it's all about spending money. if you are unwilling to pay you cannot play the game at all. it takes 6 hours a single energy refill unless you buy it of course. this is by far the worst when it comes to pay to play apps and the game play…
Aggressive ad load
Ads aren't registering for me. For example, you can use ads to knock 2 hrs off training, add 10 pts to fitness, daily rewards, play quick/friendly games, etc. I watch the ad and nothing happens. Had this problem for well over a week now…
2 unskippable ads before even getting a chance to play a game. Uninstalled immediately. Not gonna play a game that forces ads before I even have a chance to play
so many ads had one ad come up and everything I tried I couldn't get rid of the ad to play the game, it too bad I was looking forward to play .
What this app sells
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.
Hands-on inspections are not yet open.