DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Forest: Focus for Productivity
SEEKRTECH CO., LTD. · Productivity

We analyzed this app across 3 independent signals and corroborated nothing unfair. That is a signal, not an audit.

Nothing unfair corroborated · unauditedConfidence: High3 signal sources2,019 reviews scannedNot human-reviewedas of 2026-10-06
 Which version this describes

This analysis describes version 5.29.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 5.29.1, updated 2026-10-02.

What the analysis found

Each finding shows what agreed and how strongly. Automated analysis

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (0.6% of 2019 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 33 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 2019 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
What we saw: Reviewers report clear pricing: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (0.3% of 2019 reviews scanned)

What reviewers said

Verbatim excerpts from public store reviews, shown as corroborating user reports. They are not Appworthy audit evidence, and a quotation is not proof of the finding it sits under.

Aggressive ad load

Disappointed With Recent Updates — I’ve been using this app for years and had always enjoyed it. Even when I wasn’t using it regularly, I would recommend it to others. With these most recent updates—the focus tasks glitching, the new…

3★ · App Store · 2026-09-08

Now with noisy, endless ads — Used to love this app but in the past week they turned on super noisy, lpng, violent video game ads at the end of focus sessions which defeats the entire point of the app. giving it a couple more days but if…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-02

I love Forest — It’s a really awesome app, but it does annoy me how many pop up ads there are, but overall, great app. Would recommend

5★ · App Store · 2026-08-10

Paywall blocks the basics

basic features should stay basic — deleted immediately when I found out I'd have to pay to listen to a podcast while in focus mode

1★ · App Store · 2026-10-03

just put your phone away. — Pretty lame that they make you pay for the app and then disable 90% of it behind a subscription-based paywall.

2★ · App Store · 2026-09-20

Ensh*ttification has ruined it — When I originally downloaded Forest, it was a one time purchase, but now they have switched to a subscription model and screwed the original payers, we basically absolutely nothing as it’s now paywalled…

1★ · App Store · 2026-09-15

States a price, or offers a one-time purchase

I brought this app many years ago when it was a paid app and I still love using this app !! — As a pro user (due to retaining the benefits from buying it from the AppStore with a one-time payment), I can confidently say that I absolutely…

5★ · App Store · 2026-08-24

Not as good as before — One of the reasons I bought this app was cause it was a one time purchase, but now they’ve come out with their plus subscription and keep pushing it, which is annoying. Really disappointed, feels like they’re just…

3★ · App Store · 2026-07-08

How the automated analysis works

Automated, corroborated, and never human-reviewed without a person.

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

 Not yet human-reviewed

Several measurements above say “Not assessed” because no artefact we hold can answer them. A human review is what resolves those — and it can remove a favourable band as easily as add one.

Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

 How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-06 Version analyzed: 5.29.13 independent signals2,019 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.